Random Pix

bungles_revisited_sml Sad Sessions dsc_9692 dsc_9108

Pages

The Press Association: Britons 'waste £52bn on gadgets'

This story arrived in my inbox yesterday and like all good headlines it did grab my attention but the more I read the story and similar related ones doing the rounds the more curious I have become about the source and its methodology.

The source of the story seems to be a British based magazine called Stuff. Stuff is apparently a “mens” magazine which is code for a magazine which will frequently pander to sexual appetites of men in a softly pornographic way as this collection of google images illustrates. Now being a men’s mag shouldn’t count heavily against Stuff but it does raise a question over its methods and since it appears to be the source of the story about eWaste I am inclined to think that the story is doing the rounds as a form of indirect marketing driven by connections between the Haymarket media company and other media enterprises in the UK.

The fact that Haymarket (the parent company that makes Stuff) is apparently owned in part by Michael Heseltine the one time British conservative politician and now Baron in the UK makes the Stuff story a bit more interesting. Here we have a suite of glossy men’s mags bombarding readers with rave reviews for the latest technological gadgets which makes money from deals with advertisers (usually the makers of said gadgets or related services) gently chastising its market for the amount of eWaste the process creates presided over by a man, who we can safely say, knows absolutely no financial hardship and suffers not from the pangs of unrequited consumerism but instead enjoys a powerful position in the British establishment.

The motivation appears to be whatever sells works and guilt is a close companion to sex so the two combined should be a winner for the future Stuff however, looking at the UK’s Telegraph site the first line in their story discloses an immediate fallacy in the claim. It’s not that fifty two billion pounds of new gadget promptly wind up in the UK trash can every year, rather it is a somewhat lesser observation that -

the average Briton only uses half of the functions available on their gadgets

So what can we expect now the news has broken that the good people of Britain are frittering away their hard earned wages on gadgets they don’t use? Well a publicly funded education campaign is one possibility, the sort paid for by taxpayers and run by private consultants that buys up expensive media space in magazines like Stuff or perhaps, a public declaration by Michael Heseltine admonishing the great unwashed for their wasteful ways is another possibility. Are we likely to see a concerted media exploration into the morality of consumerism or a huge public outcry about the waste of resources? I think I will leave the answer to your imagination…

The Press Association: Britons ‘waste £52bn on gadgets’.

  • Share/Bookmark

To beat terror, defeat its ideas | The Australian

Interesting…

How to you defeat an idea? Shall we put two ideas in a ring together and see which one is victorious after a number of rounds? The two ideas can slug it out for the amusement of punters and the financial benefit of the promoter.

But the metaphor is inadequate since a defeated idea can simply go away to lick its wounds and come back another day. No, defeating an idea is not that easy, if it was a lot of human history might never have happened.

Carl’s article is the war on terror Version 2. The enemy is now within, no one can be trusted. Who is thinking what ideas? Perhaps there is a terrorist in the minds of people already, maybe our teaching system is exposing children to the risk of an unwanted idea. And how shall we defeat these ideas? With money and public policy?

Part of the liberal western tradition is founded on plurality of free ideas as opposed to say a more doctrinarian approach. Supposedly the liberal approach to ideas creates a more flexible and more durable society which is evidenced by the dominance of the west so it is strange to see anyone in the west advocating a more tyrannical approach to what can be thought. Frankly it seems to indicate a faltering of the western liberal tradition to be discussing how to kill any idea.

In the contest of ideas it isn’t the worst ideas that are killed off, rather it is that better ideas prosper. The failure of the war on terror and what could become the war on ideas is they have not defeated bad ideas with better ones. The extreme questions the terrorist have posed to the west have not been answered with superior ideas and until they are, the idea of terrorism and its actions will continue to prosper. Spending money and devising policy might be a response but it’s never going to address the heart of the matter.

To beat terror, defeat its ideas | The Australian.

  • Share/Bookmark

Dear Gertrude

Trawling thru the tubes I once came upon this natty little blog called Culturazi which provided sanctuary for the endangered species of radical wordsmiths who despite the trials and tribulations of these times continue to practise their craft for the illumination and edification of those who take the time and trouble to absorb their musings. Over the years many have been and gone on Culturazi but one voice has consistently stumped up week in and week out to provide sustenance for the hungry masses whose lives are often blighted by the hard times we live in. That voice is Gertrude.

Therefore I am saddened by the announcement by Gertrude that she is retiring from her position of most talented writer and spokesperson for the vaguely annoyed and somewhat leftish bohemiatic travelling circus that populates the good pages of Culturazi. However since I have also come to personally be acquainted with the real life Gertrude I am confident that this break represents a mere hiatus in her literary efforts and that her obvious talents will find another rewarding outlet and so, whilst it is with much sadness that I note Gertrudes imminent departure from the blogshpere I am nonetheless grateful for her highly enjoyable posts and the efforts she has expended in bringing some small rays of sunshine into our otherwise unhappy little lives.

One thing is for certain, Gertrude in some form will always be with us. In this crazy mixed up world the act of speaking your mind and making the place more humane might seem less impressive than the concrete steel jungles we are building or the whiz bang technology that is enslaving us but it remains the most human of characteristics and one that deserves far more recognition than it gets.

But Gertude isn’t quite done yet so there is still time to enjoy her writing seasoned with all the goodly freshness that a respectable blog brings to our reading enjoyment. It could end in a whimper or cataclysm of orgastic wordplay but only the readers of Gertrudes Diary will ever know.

  • Share/Bookmark

Miranda Devine – stating the obvious

Ms Devine has a habit of penning some enticing lines, I mean the topic of Gen Y and politics seems enticing as does her exploration of the Green Police ad that screened during the US Super Bowl but her article simply fail to deliver anything new.

When Labor came to power in 2007 only the supremely optimistic could possibly believe that a new government was going to achieve anything worthwhile on the question of climate change and the environment and such optimism rapidly becomes unsustainable in the face of our daily experiences. Miranda asserts that it is only Gen Y that smells a rat when its obvious that any thinking person is capable of perceiving the folly of mainstream politics.

If Gen Y’s are giving voice to their scepticism and doubts then I expect to see revolution in the streets sometime soon but a different picture emerges if we consider the forces trying to influence the mindshare of Gen Y. South Park and the Simpsons might be entertaining as is a clever car ad that pokes fun at the notion of a green police but they are hardly inspiring people to achieve better.

You can sum up the contribution of such mindnumbing mediocrity in a simple motto – social consensus is undesirable so look out for yourself. A message brought to you by Rupert Murdoch (owner of the Simpsons) or a car maker (Audi) is hardly a source of “real answers”.

A greater moral challenge isn’t invoked by the consideration of a new “green diesel” powered car, nor is it invoked by a carefully orchestrated TV meeting with the PM. When the serious and savvy people decide that the institutions which used to serve a purpose are no longer suitable for these times, then Miranda might be able to claim the future is in good hands. Until then it seems like we are just witnessing the ongoing sublimation of dissent through the time honoured practice of sophisticated rhetoric and amusing time killers.

Miranda Devine.

  • Share/Bookmark

YouTube - A People's History of American Empire by Howard Zinn

Some great cartoon work…

YouTube – A People’s History of American Empire by Howard Zinn.

  • Share/Bookmark

Honda FCX Clarity | Hydrogen re-filling station

The hydrogen-electric Honda

The FCX Clarity is a pretty impressive piece of high-techory but why must we wait 10 years or so before such gizmos are generally available when clearly they could have been made before now. The almost inescapable answer is that complementary relationship between car makers and oil companies is determined to wring the last drop of oil out of the planet before they concede the folly of using a non renewable resource for the mundane business of moving people and stuff around. Of course the Honda is still another “made” thing which probably will require considerable amounts of electricity and raw materials to get into your 21st century driveway so Honda’s talk about sustainability only goes so far, still its better than GM’s Hummer

Honda FCX Clarity | Hydrogen re-filling station.

  • Share/Bookmark

Out of the mist ...




Out of the mist …an image by suburbanbloke

Australia, like most countries in the world, nominates a particularly significant day to symbolise the modern nation state. The modern nation that is Oz has its origins as a penal colony founded by the British who decided that the country was simply a piece of property they could claim by the wonderful expedience of planting a flag and announcing they owned the land. Understandably the indigenous aborigines refer to Australia Day as Invasion Day.

Since then the invading population of largely European origins has achieved some significant milestones. According to Wikipedia, 70% of the native vegetation has been cleared and the surviving Aborigines have a life expectancy that is approximately 20 years less than the average white Australian. The farming practices imported from Europe have proven to be incredibly unsuitable in this hot dry land. As a result land degradation, dry land salinity and erosion marred substantial areas of once productive arable land. The inland waterways of the south east are tottering on the brink of collapse poisoned by blue green algae, overrun with imported pests like European Carp and starved of water by a rapacious system of dams that “manage” the water for the farms and cities.

So my reflections on Invasion Day (the day the British formally began the hostile European invasion of Australia) are coloured by what 200 years of occupation has done to this piece of the earth. While our Prime Minister and others talk about the “greatest nation” and a place of opportunity that is built on some questionable notions of egalitarianism and a “fair go” little is said about the plainly unsustainable ecological practices that underpin the modern Australia. In that context I would like to draw my readers attention to just one example, however it is an example which illustrates the intellectual disconnect that is a hallmark of 21st century humanity in this country.

The issue is water. Amongst other dubious claims that Australia makes about itself is the idea that this country is the driest and hottest continent on the planet. We thrust out our chests and bang loudly as though this fact is somehow an indication of just how tough and resourceful Australians can be in the face of adversity. We proudly point to ecological disasters like the Snowy Mountains Hydro Scheme and claim that they somehow represent a crowning glory in our battle to overcome this harsh and unforgiving land. Yet all these words and metaphors obscure a simple reality: when the white men invaded this country and commenced their initial forays into the interior they found a few rivers, sources of drinkable water that sustained their explorations and the indigenous populations of humans and animals. No doubt Hume and Hovell on their famous journey from Sydney to Port Phillip Bay enjoyed their river crossings as a time when they could refill water bottles and maybe catch the odd fish.

Yet these days the water quality of our inland waterways, in particular the rivers that make up the Murray Darling basin are pretty much undrinkable in their untreated state. You probably could drink it if your life depended on it but in most places the river water is contaminated by high levels of nitrogen which in turn breeds noxious blooms of algae, not to mention the usual pollution from other man made sources such as mines and factories. The river themselves are often slower due to the regulatory effect of upstream dams and weirs and carry sediment that has been flushed into the rivers from the creeks eroded by decades of inappropriate farming. As a result, the water of the Murray which sustains the city of Adelaide must be heavily treated to remove an unusually high level of salt and other contaminants, a process that seems unlikely to be sustained as the SE of Oz continues to feel the effects of a warming planet.

This problem of water is conveniently projected as a challenge to town planning or farming but it seems equally obvious that the “challenge” is not so much a challenge but a consequence of 200 years of exploitative land use. In Canberra, where federal parliament sits to debate matters of importance and device policies that supposedly lead to a better Australia, approximately 300,000 people routinely live their daily lives. They wash in fresh water and they flush their toilets, they pave the roads and create artificial lakes to trap the resultant stormwater where a few enthusiastic Canberrans can enjoy sailing or canoeing. Yet the price of this comfortable existence is not truly paid by those who enjoy running water from a tap, nor is the obvious sanitary affect of a functional sewage system considered since the whole notion of a sewage system is to effortlessly remove such concerns from the minds of men, women and children. But the conversion of pure fresh water into sewage does have a consequence and despite the effectiveness of Canberra’s sewage treatment plant, it is still a fact that the Murrumbidgee River receives 90 megalitres of Canberra’s waste water every day, all this water coming originally from fresh water sources that used to flow unimpeded into the river before the arrival of the Europeans.

Even more revealing of the exploitative attitude in the minds of Canberrans is a recent debate over the question of recycling drinkable water. The idea was floated during the most recent dry spell that saw dam levels drop to around 30% of capacity and the local water utility conducted a pilot scheme to investigate the idea. Overwhelmingly Canberrans rejected the idea that they should have to drink their own waste water yet it is obviously okay for water which is less effectively treated to be pumped into the major artery of our inland waterways.

For people whose lives are conditioned by what they see and hear in the mainstream media and who have no experience of nature in a relatively unspoilt state, the idea of a river whose major tributary is a sewage treatment works might seem like an acceptable state of affairs but the natural order is as unforgiving as it is undeniable and the long term consequences of such exploitative behaviour are starting to emerge. Native fish stocks are almost vanishing as are other native aquatic species. Replacing them, probably briefly on a geological time scale, are the invading pests like the carp. The outbreaks of poisonous blue green algae are now so common that they hardly rate as news and most of the waterways are lined with a slimy build-up of conventional algae as they are deprived the flushing effect of floods and enriched by nitrogen rich run-off from farms.

This is not something to be proud of as an Australian. It shows a criminal disregard for the very land that sustains us and the continuing practices that see the process accelerate, Canberra is projected to grow to 500,000 people over the next 20 years, demonstrate a dangerous contempt for biological and ecological processes. Instead of building unsustainable societies based on fictitious symbolism it is time for Australia to take a seriously long look at what it has destroyed in the last 200 years and made an attempt to repair some of the damage. It was easy to say sorry to the Aborigines, that was cost free, but doing something positive about their plight is as unlikely to happen as doing something real about the lifeblood of all humans in this hot dry place, our water. Neither is cause for celebration on Australia Day.

Out of the mists we Europeans came, we played briefly in the golden light and gorged ourselves on the fruits of heaven before we disappeared…

  • Share/Bookmark

ABC to launch 24-hour news channel

Nothing happens quickly at the ABC. Mark Scott’s announcement today has been a long time coming and probably has more to do with Australian federal election cycles than anything else.

2010 is an election year so the traditional media will beat themselves into the usual lather as willing participants in the politics of distraction while ignoring those items that seemingly are beyond the scope of the mainstream news. Questions about our future, our dependence on economic growth and our reliance on carbon based fuel with its attendant greenhouse emissions will no doubt continue to be a preoccupation for the loony left-wing watermelon party while the real business of keeping the good ship Status Quo afloat will be entrusted to the serious politicians and those media that can be trusted to tell the right stories.

Then there is the issue of consolidating the news outlet into one location, conveniently located in Ultimo Sydney where the newsmakers can sup their morning lattes while wondering about how they will beat the peak hour rush home. But Mark Scott says

“No media organisation in the country is better equipped to deliver this channel than the national broadcaster”

so who am I to argue?

It would seem that most of the respondents on the ABC site agree. Hardly surprising since the ABC fan clubs around the country have been amazingly successful in generating a vociferous grass roots mentality that places the ABC somewhere between Mt Everest and Heaven, sublimely untouchable and beyond all serious criticism. All for a mere 8 cents a day….

However all sniping aside, there remains a rather thorny issue here for ABC management, one which I expect they will solve in the usual heavyhanded wasteful manner, and that is just how will they generate 24hrs of new daily content, even if it is “news” and do so without more money? And if they can do it without more money does that mean that they have been squandering money in the past?

But according to Scott the solution is the new technology that the ABC has been busy spending squillions on. This new gear will allow stuff to get re-purposed across the spectrum of ABC outlets without involving a lot of extra people because as we all know people cost money. But as anyone who has watched Sky’s continuous news would know, “news” can be a fickle commodity. Some days there is more “news” than you can poke a stick at, other days, the best news story is the new monkey at the zoo.

Strangely the “news” seems to emanate from the places where there is a lot of media already present. A cynic might be inclined to judge that the media manufacture the “news” to certain extent, they certainly facilitate its transmission to larger audiences and in that context Mr Scott is bang on the money when he says that no else is better equipped to deliver “news” than the ABC.

Will the new ABC 24hr news render the localised state based 7pm bulletins obsolete? Probably in time, yes. Will it supplant the other ABC news services such as News Radio? Possibly. More likely is a scenario where less resources are available for the other news services within the ABC as more output feeds the 24hr appetite.

What we are likely to see is news for the sake of news. Minor story changes between midday and 6pm in order to keep the story alive. Feeding controversy and generating debate on the deep and meaningful issues of our time and getting talking heads on the screens. News, news and more news…all of it brought to you by your big friendly ABC.

As for thoughtful insightful behind the scenes research and development of the kind that used to be the strength of productions such as Four Corners, well who watches that these days, its all in the NEWS!

Will it affect the decline of newspapers, who cares? It’s just another establishment mainstream media player monopolising and managing public opinion in the interests of maintaining a social consensus which conveniently ignores any alternatives.

Snoooooooze…

ABC to launch 24-hour news channel – ABC News Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Journey - Trees for Life

The Journey – Trees for Life

  • Share/Bookmark

Twitter hiring workers to turn Tweets into money | Reuters

It seems that Twitter is looking to cash in on its users according to this unsurprising news story. Perhaps the collective twitter mind could be tapped for some inspired business ideas. Imagine a tweet from twitter…we love giving you this free service but someone has to pay, send us your ideas.

Twitter hiring workers to turn Tweets into money | Reuters.

  • Share/Bookmark