The cult of less? Predicated on owning two eBook devices and a laptop with no means of personal transport. Sounds perfect for New York, a place of 20 million people where the streets are too small to fit everyone at once and apartments extend to the height of small mountains.
Is this the face of life in the 21st century, dependent on the ubiquitous internet and a neverending cycle of technology consumption for HAPPINESS?
When do the red and blue pills start appearing?
I mean look at this guy, he jets around the world for his holidays, buys a new computer every year or two and his life at 23 is complete.
DJ’s living on couches sounds very bohemian but try telling that to small army of unemployed homeless people everywhere in the world. The values implicit in this “story” are mind boggling.
Seemingly disconnected, these far-flung disasters are reviving the question of whether global warming is causing more weather extremes.The collective answer of the scientific community can be boiled down to a single word: probably.
Rodney Tiffen writes on the last of three inquiries into the so-called Climategate emails however in his conclusion that the media created damage to popular support for action on carbon he fails to state the obvious question. Why?
Why did the mainstream media give so much credence and coverage to what was transparently a sensationalist stunt with the obvious purpose of derailing the Copenhagen summit?
A simple explanation may well be that the mainstream media, particularly the populist press were keen to reinforce their self importance in the minds of the public by “breaking” significant news. Since their reputation for accuracy is highly questionable anyway, truth was never really a consideration. They simply exploited the big story to sell their product.
While this simple and more conventional argument has some logic to it, there would seem to be a more sinister aspect to the source and motivation of some of the more outspoken mouthpieces for the denialist camp. Clearly they were politically motivated in their desire to undermine the science on climate change and furthermore they were enabled in that process by their position. The obvious objective was always to first undermine any consensus at Copenhagan with a second even more desirable objective to raise doubt in the minds of the public.
Have the reporters, journalists and editors responsible for spreading such a blatant piece of propaganda publicly admitted their wrong-doing and have they been summarily dismissed from their offices? No.
What’s more they wont be because they did exactly what they were supposed to do and did an excellent job of it. Strangely for an industry whose purpose is to manufacture consent, for once the industry decided to undermine popular belief in something it had helped create. It defies belief that such a course of action was merely the work of a handful of independent operators.
Three months after the explosion and fire that killed 11 workers and released millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico BP seems to have finnally manged to cap the well.
Kent Wells (unfortunate name) announced rather stupidly that
“I am very excited that there’s no oil in the Gulf of Mexico,”
I am sure he meant there would be no new oil leaking from the site of Deepwater Horizon since it is extremely unlikely that all the oil that has leaked into the Gulf since April 20 has magically disappeared. Of course BP and the rest of the oil industry will be hoping that the cap will end public debate on the wisdom of offshore drilling and that the business of raping the world can continue in due course. As for the environmental consequences of 100 million gallons plus of crude oil leaked into the ocean, I am sure we will get bombarded with reassuring messages of how it isn’t really as bad as we might have imagined…
Michelle Grattan in her analysis of Gillard’s lurch to the right has concluded that the left wing of the ALP is dead.
Interestingly, Gillard has got away with her asylum backflip within Labor Party ranks. Partly, it is that she is new; also, the election is so close. But the quietness shows as well that the left within the ALP, traditionally exercised about these things, is effectively dead
With Faulkner retiring to the backbench and Tanner leaving politics completely Grattan’s observation has some credence. Any claim that Gillard herself is a closet red is laughable. Some might say the ALP and its supporters have finally accepted economic realities, others might observe that the ALP has abandoned the fight to change the economic conditions that enslave the vast majority. I think regardless of the motivation, Grattan’s conclusion is correct.
Like a few people I am rather cynical about the role of the mainstream media (msm). In part this cynicism arises from working in media for a while, in part it is reinforced by the fact that the msm has become a fully integrated component of the capitalist system and as such is unable to examine or question the dominant paradigm that seems to have the world rushing towards a rather unpleasant future.
Yet its role in providing us with some form of public record of events persists. In this regard I am not referring to the vast quantities of opinions or op-edits that clutter most of the press sites or their physical manifestations. Nor am I talking about the gratuitous and highly condensed form of TV reporting that graces our screens around dinner time. I am simply observing the fact that the press still provides a first draft of history, incomplete for sure, but a draft nonetheless. However we also learnt something else from the Rupert’s Australian in recent times.
What we learnt or observed quite explicitly is that the public domain of knowledge about what goes on in the corridors of politics is manipulated by practitioners of spin who are highly connected to media outlets and political sources. We see daily the public fascade of politics, the proceedings of the houses of parliament are public record, and we glimpse the stage managed events designed to neatly encapsulate some minute bit of government policy. And then we get the codified version of the behind the scenes mechanations offered up by the various journalists imbedded into Parliament House.
Imbedded journalists were used by the US recently to improve their media profile during the invasion of Iraq and in the Afghanistan campaign. The idea was that such journalists or media would form a close relationship with their protectors and report a version of the ground war that was largely sympathetic to the US mission. Of course given the life and death nature of combat, the highly charged emotional nature of such environment has parallels with the psychological phenomenon know as the Stockholm Syndrome.
The atmosphere in media circles on Capitol Hill during the few days that saw Rudd deposed in favour of Gillard was highly charged. The twitterverse was alive with random noise and the iPhones were hardly able to stay on charge long enough to work for more than a few hours. The symbiotic nature of the relationship between institutionalised media that is embedded into Parliament House and the political sources was clearly illustrated, both needing the other to play a role in a drama that becomes part of the public record, both reaffirming and legitimising the other.
There is a widespread belief especially among left leaning circles that the media has an overriding right wing political agenda. This view is often expressed when considering the overly political “campaigns” waged by the Australian against things like the government’s roof insulation scheme or school building program. Given such concerns it seems remarkable to learn that certain elements within this so-called left leaning government were using the very same media to conduct a campaign of destabilisation directed against the incumbent Prime Minister.
What is knowable about the events of last week is limited. Public access to the halls of Parliament House is restricted, our knowledge is mediated by professionals. These professionals in turn are locked in with their subject material and on one hand they are dependent on the business of politics to justify their existence. On the other hand they are subject to the demands of efficiency or motivated by concerns for profitability even if such considerations are at arms length to the day-to-day business of reporting on politics.
What is clear from the events of last week and the behaviour of the msm is simply that none of it can be trusted to inform the public with a complete factual record of what goes on. Clearly the media subscribes to the notion that we can’t handle the truth. Also clear is an acceptance and exploitation of this modus operandi by political parties. Equally as likely is the idea that drama of politics transcends the business of government which has serious implications for any concerns about the capacity of government to improve the living conditions of the public they supposedly serve. The soap opera of politics now dominates the inquiring mind of the our fourth estate watchdogs while the broader substantive issues are abandoned to writers who preach from the pulpit of vested interest.
As the tropical storm season kicks in BP’s dubious contribution to a better world continues to poison the gulf with “current official estimates suggesting between 35,000 to 60,000 barrels a day are leaking from the rogue well.” BP estimates it has collected over 24,000 barrels on Friday and about 11,640 barrels in the first half of Saturday.
Despite reports that oil continues to leak into the gulf at an alarming rate the continuing pressure on the stock of BP and the need for other oil companies to stay afloat has forced one man, a judge in the US, to overturn the Obama moratorium on new oil wells in the Gulf.
Oil companies say the government has not proven the need for a blanket ban on deep sea drilling and warn it will lead to major layoffs. Judge Feldman agreed and in his ruling on Tuesday sharply rebuked the U.S. government.
The downward pressure on BP’s stock price has now been linked to pensioner funds in the UK. So the global impact of our neverending thirst for stuff to put in our cars rewards the capitalists but punishes the workers potentially affected by the moratorium, undermines the financial security of retirees and still costs the earth.
Of course it is easy to suspect the motivation of a single judge delivering a decision that favours the oil companies despite the explicit wishes of the President. Even from Oz you can easily imagine various scenarios that would explain it. Local pressure to keep local businesses afloat, traditional distrust of the north by the south or straight out graft and corruption.
But there’s a far more troubling dimension to this news. It connects somewhat arbitrarily to the local mining reaction to the election of Julia Gillard as PM. Both outcomes seem to illustrate that public politics is subservient to other forces. Our democratically elected representatives can do no more than ask the capitalists to play along. When the capitalists decide not to play the game is up.
And just in case you thought there was some vestige of the socially progressive spirit alive in the US consider the news (both fair and balanced) from Fox News that in the US the minority Republican extreme right has somehow defeated an Obama bill that would extend unemployment benefits and provide financial assistance to the states to avert unemployment. The reason, government debt. Of course government expenditure on defence in the US has nothing what so ever to do with government debt, let alone the billions of dollars routinely handed private enterprises like Blackwater.
The unreformed finance sector is the central vehicle for this rollercoaster. The perspicacious Lordon once more: “Save me or I’ll kill you.” Or, more accurately, “Save me and I’ll kill you.” A sector whose integral function in economic activity gives it a public purpose has been appropriated for entirely private ends, and with disastrous consequences.
Meanwhile here in Oz the MSM are reporting the banks (all 4 of them) recorded a 9% increase in income from bank fees last financial year, a little under half of that coming from households who pay fees for mortgages, personal loans and credit cards.
Also echoing sentiments expressed by Jones, the ongoing debacle surrounding the Government’s moderate proposal for a Resources Rental Tax has included repeated threats by multinational mining companies to take their business elsewhere unless they get the proposed tax scrapped.
Despite the spectacular collapse of high risk schemes on Wall Street based on pernicious and predatory lending schemes and the public retreat of neoliberal ideology it is obvious that capitalists has no intention of modifying their behaviour or a desire to accommodate any desired social objectives that might be expressed by the majority of people. While this is classically portrayed as fundamental to the nature of free-enterprise and human behaviour it is also underlines the necessity for structural change. The choice is fairly obvious, either capital is brought within the sphere of social control or any ideas of social progress and ecological stabilisation must be jetisoned since the two are clearly incompatible.
I mean look at this guy, he jets around the world for his holidays, buys a new computer every year or two and his life at 23 is complete.
Three months after the explosion and fire that killed 11 workers and released millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico BP seems to have finnally manged to cap the well. 
