Qed

Rudd’s secret polling on his leadership

The extraordinary media campaign against KRudd’s Labor government continues in the Oz and it seems Fairfax media has been suckered into the media agenda. Yet if evidence of the failure of the mainstream media to explore the story behind the news was ever wanting then today’s article by Peter Hatcher and Phillip Coorey illustrates just how shallow journalism can be.

On the face of it the SMH story is based on rumours that a KRudd staffer is checking on the party room support for his man. Well blow me down if that has never happened before. Then there’s bit of duboius context before we get something more concrete, that is the concerns of Labor MP’s as expressed in the caucus room, any one of which would surely be more newsworthy than a bit of speculation based on hearsay.

However…

The chief concerns MPs listed yesterday were asylum seekers, the cost of living, mental health, the mining tax, and climate change.

also illustrates the extent of the problems face by KRudd and Co and I think explains some of the optimism in the mind of the Mad Monk. On asylum seekers and boat people the government is faced with a force completely beyond their control. Let’s face it, as the world goes Australia is a pretty good place to live and it’s inevitable that the hundreds of millions of people immediately to our north agree. Short of sinking the boats and and throwing everything we can into protecting our northern frontier we will find increasingly that more people are going to take the risk of a journey in an open boat to our shores.

Likewise cost of living is a problem largely beyond the control of the governments of today since costs are largely determined by the private sector who profit from making life affordable for the masses. Another sharp jump in oil prices for example would be a killer for the government but something over which they have no control. Similarly if food production was suddenly hammered by catastrophic climate change then there’s bugger all the government can do about it. This is a consequence of laissex faire economics, something no socially progressive government with leftish tendencies has actually dealt with in recent times.

Similar arguments can be extended around mental health. I am reminded of an experiment where rats or mice were allowed to keep breeding but their physical constraints were fixed, that is as their numbers increased they became more crowded. Their social patterns became disrupted and individual behaviour became more erratic. Humans are not rats or mice but our 21st century lifestyles are relatively a long way from our hunter gatherer evolution. Does KRudd have a panacea for that?

Of course global warming is a subject far far away for this government but it and the mining tax also illustrates how the combined conservative right in this country is frustrating the will of the people as expressed in the election of KRudd and Co yet simultaneously exploiting the political impasse to gain popular advantage. Without senate control Labor’s laws always had to be negotiated through which meant that anything which upset the myriad of self interested groups represented by the various nutbags in the senate (stand up steve fielding and nick xenophon) as well as the reactionary right as represented by the liberal party and its country cousins wasn’t going to see the light of day. And then Labor gets smashed in the popular press for inactivity or failure.

Australians took a half step towards the left when they elected KRudd and Co but the parliamentary system deliberately constrains the capacity of governments to act. Journalists have no such constraints and they seem incapable of any insight beyond the fascade of sensationalism or opinionated speculation.

Rudd’s secret polling on his leadership.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago at 10:37 am.

Add a comment

Miranda Devine – stating the obvious

Ms Devine has a habit of penning some enticing lines, I mean the topic of Gen Y and politics seems enticing as does her exploration of the Green Police ad that screened during the US Super Bowl but her article simply fail to deliver anything new.

When Labor came to power in 2007 only the supremely optimistic could possibly believe that a new government was going to achieve anything worthwhile on the question of climate change and the environment and such optimism rapidly becomes unsustainable in the face of our daily experiences. Miranda asserts that it is only Gen Y that smells a rat when its obvious that any thinking person is capable of perceiving the folly of mainstream politics.

If Gen Y’s are giving voice to their scepticism and doubts then I expect to see revolution in the streets sometime soon but a different picture emerges if we consider the forces trying to influence the mindshare of Gen Y. South Park and the Simpsons might be entertaining as is a clever car ad that pokes fun at the notion of a green police but they are hardly inspiring people to achieve better.

You can sum up the contribution of such mindnumbing mediocrity in a simple motto – social consensus is undesirable so look out for yourself. A message brought to you by Rupert Murdoch (owner of the Simpsons) or a car maker (Audi) is hardly a source of “real answers”.

A greater moral challenge isn’t invoked by the consideration of a new “green diesel” powered car, nor is it invoked by a carefully orchestrated TV meeting with the PM. When the serious and savvy people decide that the institutions which used to serve a purpose are no longer suitable for these times, then Miranda might be able to claim the future is in good hands. Until then it seems like we are just witnessing the ongoing sublimation of dissent through the time honoured practice of sophisticated rhetoric and amusing time killers.

Miranda Devine.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted 6 months, 4 weeks ago at 9:05 am.

Add a comment

Cities in planning spotlight | The Australian

Jeez Kev I though you might have talked about the what it means for people instead of how important it is for “the prosperity of our economy”. Has anyone else noticed just how inculcated the notion of “our economy” has become in everyday speech. Garrett was prancing around at the National Press Club yesterday, talking about how important the arts are to “our economy” which was probably just as well since it meant he didn’t have to answer any difficult questions about his parties’ plan to dismantle the local publishing industry so booksellers can sell cheaper books. Selling books is of course also about “our economy” just like selling shitloads of coal to the world is about “our economy”.

Its time “our economy” got shoved where the sun doesn’t shine. We need to start talking about “our ecology” or “our planet” or even “our humanity”. How the hell do people like Kevin reconcile the idea of megacities of 7 or 8 million with our current destruction of the biosphere? Is there a column in Kevin’s little chart of accounts for the environment, where does the water come from when the dams dry up and how high will the cost of housing be given they aren’t making any more land last time I looked…

And what’s with the Oz just running Kev’s speech without any context? Are they trying to outdo the ABC as the official government mouthpiece? Kev’s website has the speech so you might think the talented and diligent journalists at News.corp might have taken some time to do some journalism on Kevin’s plan for the future.

Cities in planning spotlight | The Australian.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted 10 months, 1 week ago at 1:25 pm.

Add a comment